Wet winter likely to keep Colorado River out of shortage next year
For the moment, Mother Nature is smiling on the Colorado River.
Enough snow has piled up in the mountains that feed the river to stave off a dreaded shortage declaration for one more year, according to federal projections released Friday afternoon.
Just a month ago, forecasters expected Lake Mead to start 2020 about 17 feet lower than it is now, below the trigger point for a first-ever federal shortage declaration on the drought-stricken river.
But several weeks of winter storms across the Mountain States have cut the lake’s expected decline by Jan. 1 roughly in half, leaving the reservoir east of Las Vegas safely above the shortage line, according to the new figures from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
“Pretty much from the middle of January until today, we’ve been on an upward trend,” said Paul Miller, service coordination hydrologist with the National Weather Service’s Colorado Basin River Forecast Center in Salt Lake City. “In terms of snowpack, we’re consistently above average across the entire basin.”
And the promising percentages are expected to climb.
Less than halfway through the month, some snow survey sites near the river’s headwaters are already reporting their wettest March on record, Miller said. “The month of March has just been exceptionally wet, especially in Colorado and parts of northern New Mexico.”
Even before the recent storms, federal forecasters had significantly upgraded their outlook for the Colorado.
In January, they were predicting another dry year, with just 64 percent of the average flow during the river’s peak April through July snowmelt period. By mid-February, that runoff forecast had increased to 74 percent. It hit 102 percent in the Bureau of Reclamation’s latest batch of monthly projections, and Miller said it could climb as high as 130 percent a month from now.
If the latest forecast holds, it would mark just the sixth year of above average flows since 2000 for the river system that supplies 90 percent of the Las Vegas Valley’s drinking water.
“It’s been a much better year than last year. It’s still not enough to break the drought, but it’s certainly a step in the right direction,” Miller said. “My guess is it will get even better. I’m not sure if it will be enough to keep Lake Mead out of shortage.”
Skirting the line
Federal regulators will declare the first-ever shortage on the Colorado if the water level in Lake Mead starts the year at less than 1,075 feet above sea level, roughly 15 feet lower than it is now. That would force Nevada and Arizona to reduce their river use by 4 percent and 11 percent, respectively.
As recently as February, such a shortage declaration seemed almost guaranteed. Now that seems unlikely.
Miller said there is two to three times more snow on the ground than there was a year ago throughout much of the Colorado River Basin, though not all of that accumulation will translate into water for the river and its tributaries. He said some of the above-average moisture will be absorbed by high-country soil left parched by 20 years of record drought. If there is enough left over to boost the level of Lake Powell and send more water downstream to Lake Mead, the river could skirt shortage once again.
Water managers will know for sure in August, when Reclamation officials issue their river operations plan for the coming year and decide whether to impose the mandatory shortage cuts based on the projected Jan. 1 water level in Lake Mead.
In the meantime, the seven Western states that share the Colorado are scrambling to finish an emergency drought plan that outlines voluntary water deductions — on top of the mandatory ones — by Nevada and others through 2026.
Drought plan drama
Reclamation Commissioner Brenda Burman has given the states until Tuesday, the last day of winter, to either finish the agreement or submit other ideas they might have before the federal government takes action on its own to keep the Colorado’s two largest reservoirs from crashing.
Right now, the so-called Drought Contingency Plan is tied up in California, where the Colorado’s largest water user, the Imperial Irrigation District, is refusing to sign the final deal unless it includes funding to address a growing environmental threat posed by the shrinking Salton Sea.
Board members for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, that state’s largest municipal water agency, responded Tuesday with a unanimous vote to absorb Imperial’s share of any cuts California might face under the drought plan — a move that effectively cuts the massive agricultural district out of the interstate deal.
“This agreement is far too important to give up now,” Metropolitan General Manager Jeffrey Kightlinger said in a written statement after Tuesday’s vote. “Seven states have worked together for years to reach this compromise and ensure a reliable water supply for the 40 million people and 5 million acres of farmland that rely on the Colorado River.”
If the drought deal gets done, the voluntary cuts are expected to kick in early next year, regardless of how wet this winter turns out to be.
Contact Henry Brean at email@example.com or 702-383-0350. Follow @RefriedBrean on Twitter.